BREAKING! PRESIDENT TRUMP DID IT, FINALLY HE DID IT – THIS IS HUGE
Check The Source Here: https://goo.gl/jtx8x7
President Donald Trump has been caught up with surveying a considerable measure of the horrendous executive orders foisted upon us by President Barack Obama in the previous administration.
One that has horribly affected agriculturists, property holders, farmers, and organizations is the guiltless sounding ‘Clean Water’ or “Waters of the United States” rule, also called WOTUS.
President Trump simply declared he will move back the rule and clarifies why encompassed by a considerable lot of the general population whom the rule hurt.
Homeowners holders who did anything even with puddles of water all alone land could successfully be stuck in an unfortunate situation from the rule due to the national government reach.
From Daily Caller:
Republicans, farmers and industrial groups have called the rule an EPA “power grab” because it extends the agency’s powers to new heights over ephemeral waters not physically connected to “waters of the U.S.”
Thirty-two states filed suit against EPA and the Corps to get federal judges to strike down the rule. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt sued to have the rule overturned while attorney general of Oklahoma. A federal judge in North Dakota issued a stay against WOTUS in August 2015, suggesting there could be legal issues with the rule.
Trump wants the EPA to ensure “waters are kept free from pollution, while at the same time promoting economic growth, minimizing regulatory uncertainty.” He additionally needs to ensure the rule regards the part of states and Congress.
The standard Trump is suggesting that records both for ensuring water and securing the privileges of landowners? The Scalia standard.
Trump will order federal officials to interpret the term “navigable waters” in a “manner consistent with the opinion of Justice Antonin Scalia in Rapanos v. United States “- a departure from the Obama administration interpretation of federal power.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in 2016, wrote in his plurality opinion for Rapanos that “navigable waters” refers to “relatively permanent, standing or flowing bodies of water” and not “ephemeral” flows.
Sounds like an extraordinary arrangement, a Scalia standard ensuring the Constitution in addition to securing the privileges of landowners and organizations.
What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comments section below.
Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links in the
post above are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and
purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, I only
recommend products or services I use personally and believe will add value to my
readers. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s
16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and
Testimonials in Advertising.”