Breaking News: Hillary Clinton Top Email Architect Found To Be In Contempt of Congress



9/22/16
Brian Pagliano, top Hillary Clinton Email Server Architect was found to be in “Contempt of Congress” for his “Failure to Appear” before the House Oversight and Reforms Committee. Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) provides contextual background for the motion before the Committee with 5 minute comments provided by Republicans and Democrats for and against the motion.

In a 19-15 vote in FAVOR of a finding of Contempt, the matter will be under review for 48 hours, after which, the recommendation will be brought before the entire House of Representatives which is required for a vote to officially find Mr. Pagliano to be in Contempt.

Should the majority of the House of Representatives vote affirmatively in favor of finding Mr. Pagliano to be in Contempt, the matter will most likely be sent by referral to the Department of Justice / Superior Court in the District of Columbia for Criminal Proceedings.

Mr. Pagliano had been subpoenaed at least twice by Chairman Chaffetz to provide verbal/written testimony regarding the Hillary Clinton Email Server issue, as well as to provide the “Immunity Agreement” that is alleged to exist providing Mr. Pagliano from criminal prosecution for any testimony he may provide before Congress.

The Immunity Agreement does not however provide protections from “Failing to Appear” before Congress as required by a lawfully executed Subpoena. Failing to Appear, and Failing to Provide Requested Documents, is potentially a criminal offense that must be prosecuted by the Department of Justice under separate charges not included within the original Immunity Agreement.

Stay tuned for further updates as there are dissenting opinions as well as supporting statements that will be uploaded to this channel shortly.

*I will immediately reply to any legitimate copyright concerns should one exist.*

*DOD Non-Endorsement Disclaimer: “The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.”*

*Department of Defense (DoD) motion and still media files are referred to as Visual Information (VI)*; in general, DoD VI that are works of authorship prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are not eligible for copyright protection in the United States.

*Fair Use Disclaimer for News Broadcasting*: The Content in this video constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. This channel is making such material available in a effort to advance the understanding of the following, including but not limited to: environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.

*NOTHING IN THIS VIDEO OR ANY VIDEO ON THIS CHANNEL SHOULD EVER BE CONSTRUED BY ANYONE THAT THIS CHANNEL CONDONES UNLAWFUL ACTS OR VIOLENCE*. All grievances, should be settled in a humane, legal and ethical manner. Comments that are of a nature that construes “Hate Speech” or other violence will likely be automatically censored, and comments banned.

source

Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links in the post above are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will add value to my readers. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

19 Comments
  1. Hugo Booo 7 months ago
  2. Bruce Walters 7 months ago
  3. rabone biggy 7 months ago
  4. Barb T. 7 months ago
  5. BlackProfessor1990 7 months ago
  6. sup2320 7 months ago
  7. Shirley Loyle 7 months ago
  8. Derek Holcomb 7 months ago
  9. MormonGuy13 7 months ago
  10. scott uhwat 7 months ago
  11. MrRoudyman 7 months ago
  12. ENCOMAN ENCO 7 months ago
  13. Betty Kuykendall 7 months ago
  14. HOPEFOR TRUTH 7 months ago
  15. The Guardian 7 months ago
  16. The Guardian 7 months ago
  17. jester cap 7 months ago
  18. nodgelyobo1 7 months ago
  19. this one 7 months ago

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy | Terms | Contact